<rant>
-,- wow, a lot of people need to actually think instead of blindly following a dogmatic religion... Marx was right. tigering opiate.
First, on the moths. If black and white were around forever, WHY THE tiger DIDNT THE BLACK GET EATEN. White trees, black moths = NO MORE BLACK MOTHS. Second, evolution is not this wolf about mating your cat and a macaw. Where the hell did you get that idea??? Research evolution before you try to disprove it. tiger. Be a rational human being for once. And to this same person, A DONKEY AND A HORSE ARE DIFFERENT SPECIES. THIS IS BECAUSE THEY CANNOT PRODUCE FERTILE OFFSPRING. For tigers sake. And there actually was a mule that was proven fertile about a month ago... so ostrich. Next, to Drav, survival of the fittest isn't bullwolf. Even though I agree that humans are parasites, that in no way challenges the validity of survival of the fittest. The ones that can cope, do, and pass their genes on. While some people quibble about it being proven... it is! It's fact! It's logic!
Aurora said: again i will say the matireials that mdae the earth, the elements, may be 230 millions years old.
So what? God fiddlefarted around for 229.994000 million years? Or he isnt as old as these elements?
Aurora said: and why would someone write the bible or BoM, the bible i kinda understand, cause the preist dudes got mulah, but nobody in the mormon society has ever been paid for having a position of high authority, so it would be useless.
WHAT??? LDS is a sect that broke off of CHRISTIANITY!! That bible was compiled by AUGUSTINE. NOT GOD!! GOD DID NOT SIT DOWN WITH PEN AND PAPER AND WRITE A BOOK!
Aurora said: it is only same-species that causes what you think is evolution, but really they just have a dormant gene when one time that one is the prominent one, then the offspring have a higher chance of that gene, and because of that gene it survives better then the ones without the genes, yet again, NO EVOLUTION.
What we think is evolution? What the tiger dude? READ A tigerING TREATISE ON EVOLUTION. THEN TELL ME WHAT I THINK. Maybe look up this dude called Mendel too. Dormant genes? Possible, but not concerning dominant and recessive alleles. And if the offspring have a higher percent of that gene.... lets hit the fast foward button. 100 generations later, the bad gene is GONE. THEREFORE, the species has evolved. Quit proving yourself wrong.
Aurora said: oh yah tyso, evolution is the cahnging of one species over millions of years, but i haven't heard any evolution believers say that it is from cross breeding animals, so i would you are fighting a losing battle with that tactic.
First, learn how to spell. Please? Then maybe some english sentence syntax? Evolution doesnt need millions of years. Stick E. Coli into a petri dish, wait three days, put penicillin into that petri dish, watch the E. Coli get decimated, leaving ones with resistance to penicillin, wait three days, add penicillin again, and watch maybe three die. I've done this lab, so tiger off.
Aurora said: btw i am a 7th grader, but don't feel too bad when i prove you wrong.
Btw, I am in college biology. Go to whatever underworld you believe in.
So. To sum it up... Learn what the tiger you are talking about, then talk about it.
To the only modipig of intelligence I've seen in this post, Jeroy, I agree. Evolution doesn't account for everything. That doesn't mean it isn't true; it just means that something else happened before it: creation maybe... maybe aliens decided to make a backwards tigertard race of parasites. Whatever.
</rant>
Re-tigering-fute that.
Apologies for the cussing. But link some of those synapses in your God-given brain, and say something that might show that you do, in fact, have a God-given brain.
For the sake of completeness,
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/...,743641,00.html is the fertile mule.